Our Disciplic Succession:
Srila Bhakti Nirmal Acharya Maharaj  Srila Bhakti Sundar Govinda Dev-Goswami Maharaj  Srila Bhakti Raksak Sridhar Dev-Goswami Maharaj  Bhagavan Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur Prabhupad
"The Sun Never Sets on Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math":
Worldwide Affiliate Branches and Centres
 
ABOUT US GUIDANCE LIBRARY DAILY PRACTICE PHOTO CALENDAR CONTACT
 

Guidance, Volume 3


Provincialism and Service to the Lord

 

There are innumerable kinds of thorns and traps in the domain of service to the Lord. One of them is provincialism [putting one's own provincial interests above the interest of the whole]. There are many mundane pious programmes organised with a provincial interest, and many become attacked by this mentality during devotional programmes as well. In fact, when one becomes overcast by this mentality, it creates an obstacle for devotional programmes. If one makes a show of trying to make something that externally looks like a devotional programme, then it is just one of the activities meant for enjoying its result.

When people, bound by provincial or national mentality, display enthusiasm and readiness for devotional(?) activities, they actually have no eagerness for service to, or love for, the Lord and Vaishnavs—they are more or less just beggars for sense gratification or selfish opportunism. Provincialists and nationalists who are engaged in either pious or inauspicious activities call it 'love for one's country' and 'love for one's nation' and are highly esteemed by the society; but such mundane love(?) is considered and censured as 'lust' (kama) and has no place whatsoever in the domain of loving devotion.

When provincialists put on a show of making a devotional programme, they look at the country, society, nation of the people from their former (non-devotional) life and think that they are dependent(?) on their mercy, easily and very firmly enthroning the concern about the benefit(?) of the non-devotee society and country in their hearts. They personally speak Hari-katha, chant kirtans, or, with even greater enthusiasm, arrange for others to speak Hari-katha while they themselves get very busy ardently performing all kinds of other services (welcoming, serving guests, etc.)—but very often sincere sadhus (indifferent to the material world), for the fear that others will give them a side-eye, become a little restrained, but, no matter how hard they try, their internal, heart-felt passion cannot cover up for the love of non-devotees towards their country, friends, and family. How long can those who feel a natural surge and inspiration deep in their hearts hide themselves under the cover of such external hesitation?

Sometimes people also see someone from their province or country and, identifying themselves with their group, or introducing themselves as a representative or a leader from that group, they act as if they are very enthusiastic to arrange various devotional(?) programmes supporting service to the Lord, (Harinam sankirtan, circumambulation of the holy dham, staying in the holy dham, listening to Hari-katha, etc.). However, when such people do not identify themselves with that particular group, they have no enthusiasm to do all this, neither do they want to get involved in any way.

Sometimes people also think that if somebody wants to build a house for the Lord or some temple in their area or country, they are ready to give support or show sympathy; but if somebody wants to build a temple, etc. or preach in another district, then their compassion diminishes, often coming to a complete halt, or even turns into envy or animosity. For example, no Indian or Bengali will agree to help you financially if you want to preach Krishna consciousness or build a temple in London or Germany. The West or North Bengalis will help you financially to build a temple or preach Krishna consciousness in East Bengal (Bangladesh), but the East Bengalis (Bangladeshi) do not want to help preaching Krishna consciousness in West and North Bengal.

Some people are even more narrow-minded—so much so that they say that if you do not build a temple in our area, if you do not preach Krishna consciousness in our area, we will not support or help you in any way. There are even people who for the sake of preaching Krishna consciousness(?) first help a lot, and when they hear that there will be another temple in the area half a mile away from them, you will get no help from them for that temple! Such people think rationally, "If we have a temple in our area, our housewives can go there to have the darsan of the Deity on foot, but if they propose to make a temple a little far, then our beloved wives will feel deprived of such an opportunity. So, we cannot help or support such temple construction in any way." Such rational thinking proves that the enthusiasm, the eagerness one feels at first is not out of love for transcendental Lord Krishna or His devotees—it is for satisfying one's own senses, for seeking an opportunity to enjoy or secure commodity for enjoyment. Such pretence of service to the Lord is nothing more than an external screen. Internally, they are trying to fulfil their own purpose (religion, wealth, material aspirations, liberation) or find mundane happiness with the help of the Lord and His transcendental devotees.

Many people put on such a show to come in the proximity of the lotus feet of a bona fide Guru. When it comes to using the money from their locality for the service at the temple of another locality, they take the opposite side and stand still showing their ethical and impartial (detached) side. They show no support for the preaching of Krishna consciousness in other areas. Moreover, if another locality is more attracted to Krishna consciousness, or there is much more preaching of Krishna consciousness in another locality, people pull back! The reason why it is important to analyse this mentality is because in this mentality, the eagerness to enjoy is stronger than the enthusiasm for service. Spiritual benefactors always pray for the mercy of the Guru, Vaishnavs and the Lord so that they may leave this mentality; they constantly and sincerely cry to the Guru and Vaishnavs so that pure consciousness may awaken within them, filled with the causeless, unconditional desire to satisfy the desires of Lord Krishna—they do not pray for any service performed out of provincial self-interest. Even though love for one's country or one's nation may be the highest moralist teaching in the world of selfish undertaking, no matter how highly it is esteemed by the mundane non-devotees, this mentality is contrary to the love of Godhead. The acute deficiency of love of Godhead and love (attachment) for one's body, house, etc.—these obstacles possess the hearts of both materialists and practitioners.

Provincialism is not kindness to the jiva souls. 'Mercy to the jiva soul' has nothing to do with the country, time, nation, or the person. There is no pursuit of self-interest in mercy to the jiva souls. There must be no attachment to mundane objects (one's own body, house, country, society, etc.). Only those who are initiated into the propensity of the consciousness focused on pleasing the Lord can be inspired to extend kindness to the souls. Attachment to one's house in disguise of nobility stands on the stage of the world in the form of a Mohini-murti of provincialism—sometimes it also wears a long piece of cloth (worn on one's neck, similar to a scarf) with the name of religion printed all over it and flashes it in front of all common people; but spiritual experts have caught up with this deceit and cheating. Practitioners must be careful about this.

There are two dangers in the practising life—fostering anger towards provincialism or, on the contrary, attachment to it. It is not a duty of the intelligent people who practise Krishna consciousness to become vindictive towards any particular province, be it your own or others'. We must leave all designative ideas and become eager to engage in the service of the Lord without hypocrisy and tendency to cheat ourselves or others but with a clean consciousness, free from offences; we must worship the instruction coming from the holy lotus feet of our Divine Master in each and every province; preach the name of Sri Guru and Gauranga everywhere; we must dedicate everything—our life, wealth, knowledge, intelligence, speech, all 'place, time and person'—in selfless assistance to the service of the Lord. If devotees can preach Krishna consciousness or build a temple of the Lord in America using the money of Bengalis(?), it will be service to the Lord; and if devotees can build a place for the devotees of the Lord to practise Krishna consciousness in some area in Bengal using American money, or if devotees preach the translation of Srimad Bhagavatam in Bengali, then more people can know about the Supreme Lord—in this way, the Lord will be satisfied. We must engage in the service of the Lord, inspired and encouraged by this ideal. East Bengalis (Bangladeshi) are not the owners of wealth, neither are Americans, nor are Indians—the king of this world is not the owner of wealth, neither are his subjects. People are only entrusted with some particular amount of money. The exclusive owner of all wealth, all knowledge, all living entities is the Supreme Lord, and He can be found in this material world only in the form of the transcendental sound. He appears in this world in the form of a Deity and the transcendental Name. Wherever there is service to this Holy Name, wherever there is love for Sri Harinam Prabhu, wherever, be it abroad or in this country, the Name of Sri Chaitanya is remembered—every country's, every province's, every nation's wealth, knowledge, intelligence, living entities must be utilised. We must not prevent the world from having the consciousness that 'everything belongs to Him' (isavasya) by drawing the curtain of provincialism over service consciousness. Beware!

Many provincialists will not hear anything about the eternal spiritual religion save and except if it is the religion of one's country, nation, bodily heritage. If one possesses this mentality, then, even if they pretend to listen about the exclusive and genuine religion of the soul, they will neither allow it to enter their ears, nor will they be able to judge about it with an unbiased mind within their hearts. This mentality, as well as fanaticism in the name of faith in the common and ancestral religion, love for the nationalist or patriotic religion is actually defined as apathy towards the benefit of the soul. "Our family line are saktas," "Our society or nation are Sivaite," "Our province's religion is Buddhism" or we accept whatever other concocted religion, worshipping our ancestors, five deities (panchopasana, mayavadi conception), etc. so-called Vaishnavism, or prakrita-sahajiya. Therefore, just as people stick to drinking hard water from a well just because their father had dug it ('tatasya kupah'), we also follow various concocted religions lending our faith to family, nation, society or country. Sincere seekers and spiritual benefactors never follow such ideas. If just because Christianity is preached in Europe; Buddhism is preached in various places on the Asian continent; mayavad, karma-jada-smartism, worship of ghosts, sahajiyaism, atibadi, etc. are preached in India—if people from all those places, inspired by the love for their own nation, try to excommunicate the non-deceitful non-dual eternal religion of the soul, who will they be cheating then?

"I was born in Odisha, so I must support the atibadi doctrine. I was born in Bengal, so I must flatter the sahajiyas. The society of Raja Ram Mohan Roy has increased, so it is necessary to establish it in any possible way. Or because I was born in Europe, if there is anything other, higher and more nourishing, than Christianity, I will not care to listen to it,"—this resolute promise has nothing to do with the search for the truth or the love for the truth. If one, under pretence of searching for the truth or love for the truth, tries to measure the religion of the soul through their sense perception to see whether some other type of provincialism arises or not—this is also not search for the truth.

Trying to measure the eternal benedictine religion of the soul under the cover of searching for the truth, Raja Ram Mohan Roy's expedition to Tibet and his discussions about Indian and foreign religions are nothing but a form of provincialism. Mundane thinking, or worldly thinking, is the mother of provincialism. There is one preacher of a concocted religion who saw once a mouse stealing ghee wicks from the room where Siva-linga was. Seeing it, he reasoned, "Will the Lord who is not able to protect the paraphernalia that is to be offered to Him be able to protect anyone else?" It was, perhaps, under the influence of such thoughts that he actually left his own provincial religion and pretended to search for the truth, but in fact he did not reject provincialism because what he accepted later on, with even more faith and determination, proved to be the same provincialism but in another form. Because he had provincial eyes he could not understand that what he saw was mundane and provincial. His sharp intellect, genius, erudition, judiciousness were covered by the screen of self-deceptive search for the truth, throwing him eventually into a tight grip of provincialism. In this way, his sham search for the truth proved to be a manifestation of mundane mentality and was even more condemnable.

There is a fake doctrine of so-called synthesis (samanvayavad) preached in this world to cater for such sham search for the truth through mundane vision, which is but an even greater deception of oneself and others. This so-called teaching of synthesis appeared as a cooked up form of amusement for people on pretence of supporting all forms of provincialisms. If we say, "The highest religion is only the religion of the soul, or bhagavat-dharma," then we cannot place any provincial doctrine on our heads considering it to be equal. So, "it does not matter where and what kind of provincialism it is, all are the same"—forgetting this basic principle, people resort to various devious means to promote their own provincialism, which is but 'synthesis' for the sake of one's own pleasure.

We must be cautious and not fall prey to any despicable version of doctrines that offer provincialism in disguise of real search for the truth. "A bona fide religion is enacted by the Supreme Lord Himself" (dharmantu saksad-bhagavat-pranitam); devotional service, beginning with the chanting of the Holy Name of the Lord, is the ultimate religious principle for the living entity in human society (etavan eva loke 'smin pumsam dharmah / bhakti-yogo bhagavati tan-nama-grahanadibhih), "the supreme occupation for all humanity is service to the transcendental Lord" (sa vai pumsam paro dharmo yato bhaktir-adhoksaje), "Bhagavatam is a religion for the pure devotees who completely reject all religious activities motivated by material gain and who are free from envy" (dharmah projjhita-kaitavo 'tra paramo nirmatsaranam satam), etc.—if we consider these scriptural statements, we can see that pure devotees reject all kinds of provincialism, they are devoid of envy and live by the eternal religion of the soul that is supremely worshippable and devoid of even a trace of deceit—such a religion must be accepted independent of the place, time or person.

Practitioners who seek truth aspiring for eternal spiritual benefit and entrance into the spiritual domain must always be careful about this. All teachings that have sprung, are springing and will spring from provincialism are an obstruction of the religion of the soul and are a fleeting friend of material religions. As soon as we see any of these symptoms in any doctrine, we must always keep away from it. The followers of all these doctrines will try to tarnish the eternal religion of the soul in the name of provincialism or some other dull religion, but it is necessary to judge such teachings with a neutral and sane mind, and when you come to judge it, you must internally, with a pure heart and intense desire, pray to the Supreme Lord so that the soul may remain always engaged in the loving service and that it may be wise enough to become free from provincialism. If there is even a slightest attachment to the mundane or worldly mentality, one's sincere search for the truth cannot not prove successful. Beware!

 

— · ◊ · —

 

 

HOUSEHOLDERS AND RENUNCIATES

OFFENDERS

CONTENTS:

Foreword
(Preface) Meaning of Festival
What Is Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math and Its Distinctions
"Without Lord Krishna Life Is Meaningless"
The Unrenounceable
Sri Radhastami
Proper Renunciation
Astakala-Lila
Is Religion the Cause of National Downfall?
Householders and Renunciates
Provincialism and Service to the Lord
Offenders
Hell
Devotional Mood (Bhakta-Bhav)
Home-interest vs Math-interest
Samsara and Bhakti
Questions and Answers

Our mind does not know what is the right way and what is the wrong way, that is why we must take some advice from the great Vaishnavs.

"HUMILITY, TOLERANCE, GIVING HONOUR TO OTHERS | HUMILITY, TOLERANCE, GIVING HONOUR TO OTHERS"